Rodriguez v. State
768 So. 2d 1229, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12720, 2000 WL 1471617
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 1215 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Flores v. State, 745 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that if issues raised in motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800 require evidentiary hearing, challenge must be raised under Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850); Jones v. State, 652 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding that rule 3.850 motion must be brought within two years of underlying conviction becoming final).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State, 768 So. 2d 1229, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12720, 2000 WL 1471617 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
768 So. 2d 1229 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
652 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Flores v. State
745 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)