Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 2002 WL 1466248
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 2002
Docket3D01-2560
StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 1051 (Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, 820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 2002 WL 1466248 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

820 So.2d 1051 (2002)

Edith E. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D01-2560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 10, 2002.

Edith E. Rodriguez, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for Appellee, Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that if "the ruling of the appeals referee was supported by competent substantial evidence, the Unemployment Appeals Commission was not free to reweigh the evidence.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc.
770 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Rodriguez v. State
820 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 2002 WL 1466248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-fladistctapp-2002.