Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 2002 WL 1466248
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2002·No. 3D01-2560·Published

Opinion

820 So.2d 1051 (2002)

Edith E. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D01-2560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 10, 2002.

Edith E. Rodriguez, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for Appellee, Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that if "the ruling of the appeals referee was supported by competent substantial evidence, the Unemployment Appeals Commission was not free to reweigh the evidence.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, 820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 2002 WL 1466248 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 1051 (Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc.
770 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Rodriguez v. State
820 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)