Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc.

770 So. 2d 298, 2000 WL 1671397
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2000·No. 3D00-1392·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

770 So.2d 298 (2000)

Joseph T. PATTERSON, Appellant,
v.
FPL GROUP, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 3D00-1392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 8, 2000.

Joseph T. Patterson, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Commission.

Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

As the ruling of the appeals referee was supported by competent substantial evidence, the Unemployment Appeals Commission was not free to reweigh the evidence. See St. Augustine Church v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n., 754 So.2d 183, 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to reinstate the referee's determination that there was no disqualifying misconduct and that the appellant is eligible for unemployment benefits.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So. 2d 298, 2000 WL 1671397 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

770 So. 2d 298 (Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Molloy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
836 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Quintas v. Jet Graphics, Inc.
824 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS
820 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Cooper v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
780 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)