Molloy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Molloy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

836 So. 2d 1127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 2003 WL 289423

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-1413

StatusPublished

This text of 836 So. 2d 1127 (Molloy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molloy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 836 So. 2d 1127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 2003 WL 289423 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the Appeals Referee’s findings of fact, that the appellant was entitled to employee benefits because he was discharged for reasons other than misconduct, were supported by competent substantial evidence, we conclude that the Unemployment Appeals Commission improvidently reversed the decision of the Appeals Referee and reweighed the evidence. See Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s Order and remand with instructions to reinstate the Appeals Referee’s decision that there was no disqualifying conduct and that the appellant is eligible for unemployment benefits.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the Appeals Referee’s findings of fact, that the appellant was entitled to employee benefits because he was discharged for reasons other than misconduct, were supported by competent substantial evidence, we conclude that the Unemployment Appeals Commission improvidently reversed the decision of the Appeals Referee and reweighed the evidence. See Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s Order and remand with instructions to reinstate the Appeals Referee’s decision that there was no disqualifying conduct and that the appellant is eligible for unemployment benefits.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

836 So. 2d 1127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 2003 WL 289423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molloy-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack