Quintas v. Jet Graphics, Inc.

824 So. 2d 985, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12024, 2002 WL 1906226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-259
StatusPublished

This text of 824 So. 2d 985 (Quintas v. Jet Graphics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quintas v. Jet Graphics, Inc., 824 So. 2d 985, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12024, 2002 WL 1906226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

SHEVIN, Judge.

We reverse the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s order rejecting the appeals referee’s determination. “As the ruling of the appeals referee was supported by competent substantial evidence, the Unemployment Appeals Commission was not free to reweigh the evidence.” Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So.2d 298, 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Moreover, the Commission did not indicate why the claimant’s unre-butted testimony could not constitute competent substantial evidence. See City of Sarasota v. Pleasures II Adult Video, Inc., 799 So.2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). On remand, the Commission shall reinstate the referee’s determination.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarasota v. Pleasures II Adult Video, Inc.
799 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc.
770 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
824 So. 2d 985, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12024, 2002 WL 1906226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintas-v-jet-graphics-inc-fladistctapp-2002.