Rockwell International v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rockwell International v. Hampton

1994 OK 137, 886 P.2d 992, 65 O.B.A.J. 4107, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 161, 1994 WL 698232

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 8, 1994

Docket83899

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1994 OK 137 (Rockwell International v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockwell International v. Hampton, 1994 OK 137, 886 P.2d 992, 65 O.B.A.J. 4107, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 161, 1994 WL 698232 (Okla. 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

[993]*993 ORDER

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Petitioner’s motion to dismiss the cross-petition for review is granted and the cross-petition filed on October 10,1994 is dismissed as untimely. All Supreme Court proceedings to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court must be commenced within twenty (20) days after a copy of the order has been sent to the parties. Unlike appeals from district court orders, there is no provision for additional time within which to commence a cross- or counter-proceeding to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court. 85 O.S.1991 § 3.6, Rule 1.100(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, Smith v. State Industrial Court, 408 P.2d 317 (Okl.1965).

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE, ALMA WILSON, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. OPALA and KAUGER, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[993]*993 ORDER

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Petitioner’s motion to dismiss the cross-petition for review is granted and the cross-petition filed on October 10,1994 is dismissed as untimely. All Supreme Court proceedings to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court must be commenced within twenty (20) days after a copy of the order has been sent to the parties. Unlike appeals from district court orders, there is no provision for additional time within which to commence a cross- or counter-proceeding to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court. 85 O.S.1991 § 3.6, Rule 1.100(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, Smith v. State Industrial Court, 408 P.2d 317 (Okl.1965).

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE, ALMA WILSON, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. OPALA and KAUGER, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1994 OK 137, 886 P.2d 992, 65 O.B.A.J. 4107, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 161, 1994 WL 698232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockwell-international-v-hampton-okla-1994.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack