Rockwell International v. Hampton

1994 OK 137, 886 P.2d 992, 65 O.B.A.J. 4107, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 161, 1994 WL 698232
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 8, 1994·No. 83899·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

[993]*993 ORDER

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Petitioner’s motion to dismiss the cross-petition for review is granted and the cross-petition filed on October 10,1994 is dismissed as untimely. All Supreme Court proceedings to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court must be commenced within twenty (20) days after a copy of the order has been sent to the parties. Unlike appeals from district court orders, there is no provision for additional time within which to commence a cross- or counter-proceeding to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court. 85 O.S.1991 § 3.6, Rule 1.100(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, Smith v. State Industrial Court, 408 P.2d 317 (Okl.1965).

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE, ALMA WILSON, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. OPALA and KAUGER, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rockwell International v. Hampton, 1994 OK 137, 886 P.2d 992, 65 O.B.A.J. 4107, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 161, 1994 WL 698232 (Okla. 1994).

1994 OK 137 (Rockwell International v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis
2004 OK 18 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2004)
Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister Quik
1996 OK 138 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1996)
Rockwell International v. Hampton
1994 OK 137 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1994)