Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis
2004 OK 18, 90 P.3d 997, 75 O.B.A.J. 862, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 20, 2004 WL 693423
Opinions
ORDER
Respondent’s motion to dismiss this review proceeding is denied with prejudice. The petitioner’s appeal to the three-judge panel was timely pursuant to the time computation set forth in 12 O.S.2001 § 2006(A). This section applies to time computations in the Workers’ Compensation Court. K.J. Construction v. Puente, 2000 OK CIV APP 138, 16 P.3d 481, Smith v. Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma, 2002 OK 57, 50 P.3d 1132, fn. 5, Johnson v. Tony’s Town Mister Quik, 1996 OK 138, 915 P.2d 355.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis, 2004 OK 18, 90 P.3d 997, 75 O.B.A.J. 862, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 20, 2004 WL 693423 (Okla. 2004).
2004 OK 18 (Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY
2017 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mothershed
2011 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2011)