Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis

2004 OK 18, 90 P.3d 997, 75 O.B.A.J. 862, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 20, 2004 WL 693423
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 22, 2004
DocketNo. 100,055
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2004 OK 18 (Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrow Trucking Co. v. Lewis, 2004 OK 18, 90 P.3d 997, 75 O.B.A.J. 862, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 20, 2004 WL 693423 (Okla. 2004).

Opinions

ORDER

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this review proceeding is denied with prejudice. The petitioner’s appeal to the three-judge panel was timely pursuant to the time computation set forth in 12 O.S.2001 § 2006(A). This section applies to time computations in the Workers’ Compensation Court. K.J. Construction v. Puente, 2000 OK CIV APP 138, 16 P.3d 481, Smith v. Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma, 2002 OK 57, 50 P.3d 1132, fn. 5, Johnson v. Tony’s Town Mister Quik, 1996 OK 138, 915 P.2d 355.

Concur: HODGES, LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, KAUGER, BOUDREAU, WINCHESTER, and EDMONDSON, JJ. Dissent: OPALA, V.C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY
2017 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mothershed
2011 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 OK 18, 90 P.3d 997, 75 O.B.A.J. 862, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 20, 2004 WL 693423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrow-trucking-co-v-lewis-okla-2004.