Robinson v. State
589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12836, 1991 WL 259455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 547 So. 2d 321 →
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction is affirmed but the sentencing order is remanded to the trial court with directions that the court either set the amount for the payment of the medical and counseling expenses of the victim or, if that amount is not yet determinable, provide a procedure for determining the amount and, at the appropriate time, set the amount. See King v. State, 546 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); [470]*470and James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12836, 1991 WL 259455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
589 So. 2d 469 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCaskill v. State
520 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
James v. State
499 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
King v. State
546 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)