Robinson v. State

549 So. 2d 773, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2314, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5346, 1989 WL 114483
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 516 So. 2d 20
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1989·No. No. 88-2390·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to an order relinquishing jurisdiction to the trial court for that purpose, it made a specific finding of fact that the defendant had validly consented to the search of his van which revealed the crack cocaine in issue. Upon that finding, which is fully supported by the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, the judgment under review is affirmed. See Zukor v. State, 488 So.2d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1986); Palmer v. State, 467 So.2d 1063, [774]*7741064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State v. Jones, 454 So.2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 549 So. 2d 773, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2314, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5346, 1989 WL 114483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 773 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
454 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Palmer v. State
467 So. 2d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Zukor v. State
488 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)