Robinson v. State

497 So. 2d 1355, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2542, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10908
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1986·No. No. 84-2098·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Frank S. Robinson appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary and petit theft. We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. First, the trial court erred by failing to include written reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Johnson, 486 So.2d 535 (Fla.1986). Second, the trial court erred in using Robinson’s habitual offender status as a reason for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED for resentencing.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 497 So. 2d 1355, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2542, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

497 So. 2d 1355 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
591 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)