Robinson v. State

540 So. 2d 265, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 839, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1209
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1989·No. No. 88-2513·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge sentenced Robinson to a within-the-guidelines sentence of ten years in prison. Because it was assessed for the third degree felony of theft of a motor vehicle, however, the term is sustainable only if the sentence is enhanced under the habitual offender act. Although the trial court, upon ample evidence, orally announced that conclusion, Robinson argues and the state concedes that the findings required to support a determination of habitual offender status must be in writing. Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985); Stanley v. State, 538 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Link v. State, 537 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The sentence under review is therefore vacated and the cause [266]*266remanded for the purpose of supplying the required written findings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 540 So. 2d 265, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 839, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

540 So. 2d 265 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
462 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Link v. State
537 So. 2d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Stanley v. State
538 So. 2d 1390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)