Stanley v. State

538 So. 2d 1390, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1353, 1989 WL 21448
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1989
DocketNo. 88-544
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 538 So. 2d 1390 (Stanley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley v. State, 538 So. 2d 1390, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1353, 1989 WL 21448 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

None of the grounds asserted by the defendant for reversal of his conviction present either error or harm. See M.H. v. State, 538 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We remand the cause, however, to the trial court for the purposes (a) of correcting the judgment so as accurately to reflect the offense of which the appellant was found guilty and (b) of making the required written findings in support of the determination that Stanley is an habitual offender. See Link v. State, 537 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
540 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Rivera v. Aldrich
538 So. 2d 1390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 So. 2d 1390, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1353, 1989 WL 21448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.