Robinson v. State

553 So. 2d 288, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6593, 1989 WL 142953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 516 So. 2d 20
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1989·No. No. 89-0442·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 982, 101 S.Ct. 1519, 67 L.Ed.2d 818 (1981); See Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that Appellant’s November 30, 1989 motion for rehearing and motion to. supplement record on appeal and to stay disposition of cause pending receipt of supplemental record are denied, without prejudice to seek post-conviction relief if pro se motion to discharge counsel is claimed to [289]*289have rendered assistance of counsel ineffective.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 553 So. 2d 288, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6593, 1989 WL 142953 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

553 So. 2d 288 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tumulty v. State
489 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Shapiro v. State
390 So. 2d 344 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)