Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2015
Docket09-17339
StatusPublished

This text of Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland (Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland, (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2015

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ROBERT MCDANIELS, No. 09-17339

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:05-cv-00904-PJH

v. ORDER RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, Warden; KRAMER, Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

KEELON T. JENKINS, No. 11-15030

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:05-cv-02003-MHP

v.

MICHAEL S. EVANS,

Respondent - Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-mcdaniels-v-richard-kirkland-ca9-2015.