Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
This text of Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland (Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2015
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ROBERT MCDANIELS, No. 09-17339
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:05-cv-00904-PJH
v. ORDER RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, Warden; KRAMER, Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.
KEELON T. JENKINS, No. 11-15030
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:05-cv-02003-MHP
v.
MICHAEL S. EVANS,
Respondent - Appellee.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-mcdaniels-v-richard-kirkland-ca9-2015.