Gonzales v. Gittere

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 25, 2024·No. 2:21-cv-02055·Unknown

Opinion

RAUL GONZALES, Case No. 2:21-cv-02055-GMN-DJA Petitioner, Vv. Order Directing the Respondents to Supplement the Record WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. This habeas matter is poised for merits review. The respondents are directed to file as supplemental exhibits all documents filed in the relevant state justice court cases PC14F00757X and 14F00757X, including the “criminal complaint” and attachments, “arrest documents,” minute orders, and reporter’s transcripts of proceedings. (See ECF No. 34-2 at 36); see also Rules } Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 7; McDaniels v. Kirkland, 813 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc) (holding federal habeas courts “may consider the entire state-court record, including evidence that was presented only to the trial court.”); Nasby v. McDaniel, 853 F.3d 1049, 1052- 54 (9th Cir. 2017) (remanding for consideration of the entire state-court record). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Respondents have until April 15, 2024, to file, as supplemental exhibits, all documents filed in state justice court cases PC14F00757X and 14F00757X, including the “criminal complaint” and attachments, “arrest documents,” minute orders, and reporter’s transcripts of proceedings. 2. The petitioner will have 10 days after the respondents file the supplemental exhibits to admit or deny the correctness of the supplemental exhibits. DATED: March 25, 2024 & M. NAVARRO UN, STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzales v. Gittere, (D. Nev. 2024).

Gonzales v. Gittere (Gonzales v. Gittere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
813 F.3d 770 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Brendan Nasby v. E. McDaniel
853 F.3d 1049 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)