Gonzales v. Gittere

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 25, 2024
Docket2:21-cv-02055
StatusUnknown

This text of Gonzales v. Gittere (Gonzales v. Gittere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzales v. Gittere, (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 RAUL GONZALES, Case No. 2:21-cv-02055-GMN-DJA 6 Petitioner, Vv. Order Directing the Respondents to 7 Supplement the Record WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 This habeas matter is poised for merits review. The respondents are directed to file as 11 || supplemental exhibits all documents filed in the relevant state justice court cases PC14F00757X 12 || and 14F00757X, including the “criminal complaint” and attachments, “arrest documents,” minute 13 || orders, and reporter’s transcripts of proceedings. (See ECF No. 34-2 at 36); see also Rules 14 |} Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 7; McDaniels v. Kirkland, 813 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2015) 15 || (en banc) (holding federal habeas courts “may consider the entire state-court record, including 16 || evidence that was presented only to the trial court.”); Nasby v. McDaniel, 853 F.3d 1049, 1052- 17 || 54 (9th Cir. 2017) (remanding for consideration of the entire state-court record). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 19 1. Respondents have until April 15, 2024, to file, as supplemental exhibits, all documents 20 filed in state justice court cases PC14F00757X and 14F00757X, including the 21 “criminal complaint” and attachments, “arrest documents,” minute orders, and 22 reporter’s transcripts of proceedings. 23 2. The petitioner will have 10 days after the respondents file the supplemental exhibits to 24 admit or deny the correctness of the supplemental exhibits. 25 DATED: March 25, 2024 26 27 & M. NAVARRO 28 UN, STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
813 F.3d 770 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Brendan Nasby v. E. McDaniel
853 F.3d 1049 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gonzales v. Gittere, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-v-gittere-nvd-2024.