Emanuel Jr v. Neven
Opinion
TROY RAY EMANUEL, Jr., Case No. 2:16-cv-01368-GMN-EJY
Petitioner, v. ORDER DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., Respondents. This habeas matter is poised for merits review. Respondents, however, appear to have omitted from their filing of the state court record (1) Petitioner Troy Ray Emanuel’s (“Appellant”) Fast Track Appendix – Volume I submitted before the Nevada appellate court, (2) Appellant’s Fast Track Appendix – Volume II, and (3) Respondent’s Appendix submitted before the Nevada appellate court. See ECF Nos. 8, 52; see also Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 7; Nasby v. McDaniel, 853 F.3d 1049, 1052-54 (9th Cir. 2017) (remanding to the district court with instructions to consider the entire state court record). It is therefore ordered that Respondents have until June 26, 2024, to file, as supplemental exhibits, (1) Appellant’s Fast Track Appendix – Volume I submitted before the Nevada appellate court, (2) Appellant’s Fast Track Appendix – Volume II, and (3) Respondent’s Appendix submitted before the Nevada appellate court.
DATED: June 18, 2024
________________________________ GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emanuel Jr v. Neven (Emanuel Jr v. Neven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.