Robert E. Wilson, III v. Daniel Valente Dantas
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Defendants have expressly abandoned their personal jurisdiction claims in their appeal to this Court. Their remaining claims, to the extent reviewable on this appeal, are without merit (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 478-479 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
80 N.E.3d 1032 (Robert E. Wilson, III v. Daniel Valente Dantas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.