Richardson v. State

772 So. 2d 608, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16004, 2000 WL 1805204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 39
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 2000·No. No. 5D00-528·Published

Opinion

COBB, J.

We affirm defendant’s judgment and sentence, but remand this case to the trial court for correction of a clerical error. The written sentence incorrectly imposes a term of probation for both counts one and two and must be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement imposing a term of probation for count one only.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 772 So. 2d 608, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16004, 2000 WL 1805204 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

772 So. 2d 608 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.