Richardson v. State

716 So. 2d 859, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11320, 1998 WL 559325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1998·No. No. 97-2490·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Richardson, after pleading to various charges pursuant to a negotiated agreement with the State and after being sentenced in accordance with such plea, did not appeal but subsequently filed a 3.850 motion for relief because of ineffective assistance of counsel. He first argues that the court erred in not providing him counsel to represent him in this matter. There is nothing about this case that indicates the court abused its discretion in not appointing counsel in this post-trial matter. See Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363 (Fla.1979).

The court conducted an evidentiary hearing in this cause, the result of which supports the trial court’s denial of relief.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 716 So. 2d 859, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11320, 1998 WL 559325 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

716 So. 2d 859 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toliver v. State
737 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Griffin v. State
721 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)