Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

768 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 2000 WL 562194
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 2000
DocketNo. 2D99-4567
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 768 So. 2d 1 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 768 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 2000 WL 562194 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order summarily denying Mary Richardson’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 because the motion is refuted by the record attached by the trial court. In her initial brief, Richardson raises an issue challenging whether the written judgment in this case comports with the oral pronouncement at sentencing. This issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal; it must initially be addressed by the trial court. Therefore, this affirmance is without prejudice to Richardson’s filing a facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence based on this claim.

Affirmed.

GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., Concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simon v. State
793 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 2000 WL 562194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.