Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

760 So. 2d 235, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 2000 WL 640559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 694 So. 2d 147 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2000·No. No. 2D00-315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arnold C. Richardson appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of. Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Richardson is requesting additional jail credit.

On appeal, Richardson argues that the trial court erred in failing to treat his motion as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. ' We affirm the trial court’s order based on the attached record and on Richardson’s failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This affirmance is without prejudice to Richardson raising this issue in a timely, properly- sworn, non-successive motion for postconviction relief filed pursu[236]*236ant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 760 So. 2d 235, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037, 2000 WL 640559 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 235 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.