Richards v. Rogers Boiler & Burner Co.

234 N.W. 428, 252 Mich. 52, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 670
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 7, 1929·No. Docket No. 112, Calendar No. 34,355.·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinions

ON REHEARING.
ON REHEARING.
In this case we granted a rehearing and reargument, and reconsideration leads us to confess error in our previous opinion, reported in 248 Mich. 155.

An award of compensation by the department of labor and industry determines liability of an employer and the extent of relief afforded an employee and is, in effect, an adjudication. An agreement between an employer and an employee fixing compensation is, when approved by the department, equal to an award made by the department. In either event the compensation runs its set course unless stopped by the department. The parties may, by settlement receipt, agree to stoppage, but, until such an agreement is approved by the department, it is noneffective.

When a settlement receipt, executed in form prescribed by the department, is duly filed with the department and action thereon requested, it is the duty of the department to accord a hearing.

Affirmed, with costs.

CLARK, SHARPE, and NORTH, JJ., concurred with WIEST, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Rogers Boiler & Burner Co., 234 N.W. 428, 252 Mich. 52, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 670 (Mich. 1929).

234 N.W. 428 (Richards v. Rogers Boiler & Burner Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mikulski v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
9 N.W.2d 20 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1943)
Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.
135 P.2d 266 (Utah Supreme Court, 1943)
Sweet v. Eddy Paper Corp.
6 N.W.2d 883 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1942)
Grycan v. Ford Motor Co.
289 N.W. 146 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)
Romanchuk v. Ford Motor Co.
288 N.W. 303 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)
Hayward v. Kalamazoo Stove Co.
288 N.W. 483 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)
Kiviniemi v. Quincy Mining Co.
282 N.W. 866 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Gauthier v. Ford Motor Co.
275 N.W. 172 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1937)
Miller v. City Ice & Fuel Co.
277 N.W. 196 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1937)
Nevels v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.
270 N.W. 272 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Hurst v. Ford Motor Co.
267 N.W. 573 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Wright v. Mitchell Brothers Co.
267 N.W. 571 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Gustafson v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.
266 N.W. 301 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Sampson v. Michigan Copper & Brass Co.
265 N.W. 472 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Oado v. Ford Motor Co.
263 N.W. 727 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Butler v. Millman
259 N.W. 877 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
McDonald v. Ford Motor Co.
255 N.W. 378 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Grant v. Chevrolet Motor Co.
250 N.W. 293 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Jaquith v. W. M. Ackerman Electric Co.
242 N.W. 854 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)
Morgan v. Chevrolet Motor Co.
238 N.W. 476 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)