Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden

338 F.3d 615, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15369, 2003 WL 21757327
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2003·No. 03-4001·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

SECOND AMENDED ORDER

This matter is presently before the court upon petitioner’s request for initial hearing en banc of the respondent’s motion to vacate the stay of execution which was granted by the district court on July 23, 2003.

The petition for initial en banc hearing has been presented to the nonrecused active judges of the court, a majority of whom have voted in favor of en banc review. Furthermore, a majority of the non-recused active judges of the court have voted to deny the state’s motion to vacate the stay of execution. The stay of execution granted by the district court remains undisturbed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden, 338 F.3d 615, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15369, 2003 WL 21757327 (6th Cir. 2003).

338 F.3d 615 (Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cowan v. Stovall
E.D. Michigan, 2021
Marion v. Woods
E.D. Michigan, 2020
Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell, Warden
392 F.3d 822 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Alley v. Bell
Sixth Circuit, 2004
Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden
338 F.3d 615 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)