Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden

338 F.3d 615, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15369, 2003 WL 21757327
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 2003
Docket03-4001
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 338 F.3d 615 (Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden, 338 F.3d 615, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15369, 2003 WL 21757327 (6th Cir. 2003).

Opinions

SECOND AMENDED ORDER

This matter is presently before the court upon petitioner’s request for initial hearing en banc of the respondent’s motion to vacate the stay of execution which was granted by the district court on July 23, 2003.

The petition for initial en banc hearing has been presented to the nonrecused active judges of the court, a majority of whom have voted in favor of en banc review. Furthermore, a majority of the non-recused active judges of the court have voted to deny the state’s motion to vacate the stay of execution. The stay of execution granted by the district court remains undisturbed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cowan v. Stovall
E.D. Michigan, 2021
Marion v. Woods
E.D. Michigan, 2020
Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell, Warden
392 F.3d 822 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Alley v. Bell
Sixth Circuit, 2004
Richard Wade Cooey II v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden
338 F.3d 615 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 F.3d 615, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15369, 2003 WL 21757327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-wade-cooey-ii-v-margaret-bradshaw-warden-ca6-2003.