Richard A. Whalen v. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors William F. Clark, Individually Raymond Eugene Robertson, Individually
Opinions
Being convinced that the district court ruled correctly in granting William F. Clark’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following the jury verdict in favor of Richard A. Whalen, we affirm the district court’s decision.
AFFIRMED.
In light of our action concerning the judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we need not address the propriety of the conditional denial of Clark’s motion for a new trial. See 9 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2540 at 618 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
797 F.2d 170 (Richard A. Whalen v. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors William F. Clark, Individually Raymond Eugene Robertson, Individually) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.