Richard A. Whalen v. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors William F. Clark, Individually Raymond Eugene Robertson, Individually
This text of 797 F.2d 170 (Richard A. Whalen v. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors William F. Clark, Individually Raymond Eugene Robertson, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Being convinced that the district court ruled correctly in granting William F. Clark’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following the jury verdict in favor of Richard A. Whalen, we affirm the district court’s decision.
AFFIRMED.
In light of our action concerning the judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we need not address the propriety of the conditional denial of Clark’s motion for a new trial. See 9 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2540 at 618 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
797 F.2d 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-a-whalen-v-the-roanoke-county-board-of-supervisors-william-f-ca4-1986.