Riccard v. State
This text of 514 So. 2d 83 (Riccard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order imposing costs under sections 943.25(4), 960.20 and 27.3455, Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant’s constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2497, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riccard-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.