Riccard v. State
514 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2497, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10724
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1987·No. No. 87-25·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The order imposing costs under sections 943.25(4), 960.20 and 27.3455, Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant’s constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riccard v. State, 514 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2497, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
514 So. 2d 83 (Riccard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyette v. State
546 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Murphy v. State
539 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)