Evins v. State
This text of 497 So. 2d 1293 (Evins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard Keith EVINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred by imposing costs under section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985) because he was indigent.
We reverse and remand for the court to make a determination of whether appellant had the ability to pay costs and, if it is determined that appellant was indigent, to give him a term of community service in lieu of payment of costs. Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292, (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st *1294 DCA 1986); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 So. 2d 1293, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evins-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.