Murphy v. State
This text of 539 So. 2d 22 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order imposing costs under sections 960.20 and 27.3455(1), Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant’s constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), and Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Hollis v. State, 525 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Riccard v. State, 514 So.2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987); and Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 So. 2d 22, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1024, 1989 WL 16657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.