Boyette v. State
This text of 546 So. 2d 120 (Boyette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That portion of the order imposing costs and attorney’s, fees is stricken because the record on appeal does not show that the defendant was given notice or opportunity to be heard as to those matters. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Camp v. State, 536 So.2d 369 (Pla. 5th DCA 1988); Morgan v. State, 527 So.2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Riccard v. State, 514 So.2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). The conviction and sentence is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 So. 2d 120, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1677, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3931, 1989 WL 75728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyette-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.