Reiter v. Crosier

459 U.S. 849, 103 S. Ct. 110, 74 L. Ed. 2d 97, 51 U.S.L.W. 3256, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 3374
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 1982
DocketNo. 81-6865
StatusPublished
Cited by85 cases

This text of 459 U.S. 849 (Reiter v. Crosier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reiter v. Crosier, 459 U.S. 849, 103 S. Ct. 110, 74 L. Ed. 2d 97, 51 U.S.L.W. 3256, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 3374 (1982).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certio-rari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Delgado
902 A.2d 888 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)
State v. Perkins
856 A.2d 917 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
Brown v. Crosby
249 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (S.D. Florida, 2003)
United States v. Mathis
96 F.3d 1577 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
5 F.3d 1255 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Quirama v. Mitchele
791 F. Supp. 82 (S.D. New York, 1992)
United States v. Anthony Caldwell
954 F.2d 496 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)
State v. Neset
462 N.W.2d 175 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Cannon v. District of Columbia
569 A.2d 595 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Maxwell v. Smith
722 F. Supp. 7 (W.D. New York, 1989)
State v. Pennington
534 So. 2d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey Sowders
853 F.2d 1340 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Underwood v. Kelly
692 F. Supp. 146 (E.D. New York, 1988)
Diaz v. LeFevre
688 F. Supp. 945 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Gary James Eagan v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
843 F.2d 1554 (Seventh Circuit, 1988)
Ethel L. Hardin v. Gary Black, Warden
845 F.2d 953 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 U.S. 849, 103 S. Ct. 110, 74 L. Ed. 2d 97, 51 U.S.L.W. 3256, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 3374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiter-v-crosier-scotus-1982.