Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.
This text of Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co. (Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RORESTE REFUERZO, Case No. 22-cv-00868-JSC 8 Plaintiff, 9 y. ORDER RE: PRIVILEGE DISPUTE Re: Dkt. No. 72 10 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CoO., ll Defendant. 12
13 The Court has reviewed in camera 23 email communications Defendant contends are 14 || protected by attorney-client privilege and as work product. (Dkt. No. 72; see Dkt. No. 69 at 5-6, 15 || 7-8.) The Court concludes the communications are privileged. See Fed. R. Evid. 501; United a 16 || States v. Chen, 99 F.3d 1495, 1501-02 (9th Cir. 1996).
18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 || Dated: April 21, 2023 20
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORL 22 United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/refuerzo-v-southwest-airlines-co-cand-2023.