Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation

811 A.2d 458, 175 N.J. 54, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1784

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 19, 2002·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 443, 785 A.2d 476 (2001).

LONG and VERNIERO, JJ., dissenting.

We would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Tax Court. Reck v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 598 (Tax 2000).

For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 5. For reversing — Justices LONG and YERNIERO — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 443, 785 A.2d 476 (2001).

LONG and VERNIERO, JJ., dissenting.

We would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Tax Court. Reck v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 598 (Tax 2000).

For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 5. For reversing — Justices LONG and YERNIERO — 2.

Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation, 811 A.2d 458, 175 N.J. 54, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1784 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

811 A.2d 458 (Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related