Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 17, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

811 A.2d 404 (2002)
174 N.J. 566

Sarah J. MORTARA and Angelo J. Mortara, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 26, 2002.
Decided April 17, 2002.

Michael L. Testa, Vineland, argued the cause for appellants (Basile & Testa, attorneys; Walter A. Schultz, Jr., on the brief).

Gerard W. Quinn, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys).

Salvatore A. Alessi, Barrington, argued the cause for respondent Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Mr. Alessi, attorney; Melville D. Lide, Vineland, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).

For affirming—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI—6.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566 (N.J. 2002).

811 A.2d 404 (Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Price v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.
846 A.2d 617 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)