Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 811 A.2d 404 (Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sarah J. MORTARA and Angelo J. Mortara, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Michael L. Testa, Vineland, argued the cause for appellants (Basile & Testa, attorneys; Walter A. Schultz, Jr., on the brief).
Gerard W. Quinn, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys).
Salvatore A. Alessi, Barrington, argued the cause for respondent Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Mr. Alessi, attorney; Melville D. Lide, Vineland, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).
For affirmingChief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI6.
OpposedNone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mortara-v-cigna-property-casualty-insurance-company-nj-2002.