Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance
811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 384
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 6.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance, 811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 2002).
811 A.2d 404 (Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
811 A.2d 404 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)