Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance
811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 384
This text of 811 A.2d 404 (Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance, 811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 2002).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 6.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
811 A.2d 404 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
811 A.2d 404, 174 N.J. 566, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mortara-v-cigna-property-casualty-insurance-nj-2002.