Raynor v. De La Nuez
This text of 558 So. 2d 141 (Raynor v. De La Nuez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alonzo T. RAYNOR, As Guardian of the Person and Property of Scott Thomas Raynor, Incompetent, Appellant,
v.
Alexis DE LA NUEZ, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin and Joel Eaton, Miami, for appellant.
Bender, Bender, Chandler & Adair, Daniels and Hicks and Ralph O. Anderson, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment in favor of the lessor is affirmed on authority and reasoning of Perry v. G.M.A.C. Leasing Corp., 549 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) and Kraemer v. G.M.A.C. Leasing Corp., 556 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Because the question affects the rights of the motoring public, we certify our decision to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance pursuant to article V, *142 sections 3(b) and (4) of the Florida Constitution.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 141, 1990 WL 26645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynor-v-de-la-nuez-fladistctapp-1990.