Kottmeier v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kottmeier v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

561 So. 2d 1369, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1990 WL 80808

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1990·No. No. 89-02501·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Affirmed. See Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So.2d 141 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 556 So.2d 431 (Fla.2d DCA 1990).

As did the Third District Court of Appeal in Raynor, we certify this case to the Florida Supreme Court as of great public importance. It involves whether under circumstances like those recited in Kraemer a long-term lessor of an automobile may be held liable under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine to a plaintiff injured by the operation of the automobile.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Judge.

Affirmed. See Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So.2d 141 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 556 So.2d 431 (Fla.2d DCA 1990).

As did the Third District Court of Appeal in Raynor, we certify this case to the Florida Supreme Court as of great public importance. It involves whether under circumstances like those recited in Kraemer a long-term lessor of an automobile may be held liable under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine to a plaintiff injured by the operation of the automobile.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Kottmeier v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 561 So. 2d 1369, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1990 WL 80808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

561 So. 2d 1369 (Kottmeier v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related