Tsiknakis v. VOLVO FINANCE NORTH AM. INC.

566 So. 2d 520
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 1990
Docket89-1769, 89-2803
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 566 So. 2d 520 (Tsiknakis v. VOLVO FINANCE NORTH AM. INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tsiknakis v. VOLVO FINANCE NORTH AM. INC., 566 So. 2d 520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

566 So.2d 520 (1990)

Theodor TSIKNAKIS and Kiki Tsiknakis, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
VOLVO FINANCE NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Foreign Corporation, and Jeanmarie Sangerman, Appellees.
Jacinto ABDALA and Marlen Abdala, Appellants,
v.
WORLD OMNI LEASING, INC., and Jerry Carver, Appellees.

Nos. 89-1769, 89-2803.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 17, 1990.

*521 Cooper, Wolfe & Bolotin, Miami, and Sharon L. Wolfe, Neil Carver, Coral Gables, Poses & Halpern, Miami, for appellants.

Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley and Edward D. Schuster, Fort Lauderdale, Herzfeld & Rubin and Jeffrey B. Shapiro and Judy D. Shapiro, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees Volvo Finance North America, Inc., and World Omni Leasing, Inc., are lessors of automobiles which were leased for periods in excess of one year. Their lessees, Jeanmarie Sangerman and Jerry Carver, respectively, each maintained insurance in the amounts required by paragraph 324.021(9)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). The two lessees were involved in separate automobile accidents. The injured plaintiffs sued the lessees and the lessors. The lessors were granted summary judgment on the ground that liability was foreclosed by paragraph 324.021(9)(b), and the injured plaintiffs have appealed.

We affirm under the authority of Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So.2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Folmar v. Young, 560 So.2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 556 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); and Perry v. G.M.A.C. Leasing Corp., 549 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), review denied, 558 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1990).

As was done in Raynor, we note that the question presented here affects the rights of the motoring public, and certify the question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abdala v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.
583 So. 2d 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Almstedt v. Halgren
572 So. 2d 1001 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Wright v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
570 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Berwald v. GMAC
570 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 So. 2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsiknakis-v-volvo-finance-north-am-inc-fladistctapp-1990.