Rooks v. Thorpe

567 So. 2d 1075, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 1990 WL 155059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1990·No. No. 90-1058·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment in favor of appellee, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, based upon the authority of Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 556 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), jurisdiction accepted, 564 So.2d 487 (Fla.1990) and Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So.2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Likewise, as in Raynor, 558 So.2d at 141, because the question raised by appellant, James Robert Rooks, “affects the rights of the motoring public,” we certify our decision to the Florida Supreme Court as one involving great public importance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rooks v. Thorpe, 567 So. 2d 1075, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 1990 WL 155059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

567 So. 2d 1075 (Rooks v. Thorpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooks v. Thorpe
578 So. 2d 710 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Wright v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
570 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)