Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant
This text of 92 F.3d 1176 (Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
92 F.3d 1176
Ralph ALEXANDER-EL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
WARREN, Correctional Dietary Sergeant; Foster, Correctional
Dietary Sergeant, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6388.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 1996
Decided: August 5, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alexander-El v. Warren, No. CA-96-459-AW (D.Md. Feb. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F.3d 1176, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25546, 1996 WL 437001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-alexander-el-v-warren-correctional-dietary-sergeant-foster-ca4-1996.