Devone Bates, and Jimmie Goosby Robert Kirven v. L.H. Breeze Eunice Belvin Unknown or Identified Medical Employees of Henrico County Jail

92 F.3d 1176, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25547, 1996 WL 436573
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1996
Docket96-6544
StatusUnpublished

This text of 92 F.3d 1176 (Devone Bates, and Jimmie Goosby Robert Kirven v. L.H. Breeze Eunice Belvin Unknown or Identified Medical Employees of Henrico County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Devone Bates, and Jimmie Goosby Robert Kirven v. L.H. Breeze Eunice Belvin Unknown or Identified Medical Employees of Henrico County Jail, 92 F.3d 1176, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25547, 1996 WL 436573 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

92 F.3d 1176

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Devone BATES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Jimmie Goosby; Robert Kirven, Plaintiffs,
v.
L.H. BREEZE; Eunice Belvin; Unknown or Identified Medical
Employees of Henrico County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided Aug. 5, 1996.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice for failure to provide the court with addresses of Defendants. The complaint may be saved by amendment. Thus, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F.3d 1176, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25547, 1996 WL 436573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devone-bates-and-jimmie-goosby-robert-kirven-v-lh-breeze-eunice-belvin-ca4-1996.