Brown v. Campbell Soup Co
This text of Brown v. Campbell Soup Co (Brown v. Campbell Soup Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1155
NATHANIEL BROWN, Individually and as Father of Nannette Annita Brown, an infant; NANNETTE ANNITA BROWN, an infant, through her father and next friend (Joseph N. Bowman has been appointed as guardian ad litem for Nannette Annita Brown), Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-996-A)
Submitted: May 28, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Brown, Joseph N. Bowman, Appellants Pro Se. Mary Catherine Zinsner, MAYS & VALENTINE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order entering
summary judgment for Defendant in this product liability action. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the
district court. Brown v. Campbell Soup Co., No. CA-95-996-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Campbell Soup Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-campbell-soup-co-ca4-1996.