Radiator Specialty Company, a Corporation v. First State Insurance Company, a Corporation

836 F.2d 193, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15356, 1987 WL 32718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 1987
Docket87-2015
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 836 F.2d 193 (Radiator Specialty Company, a Corporation v. First State Insurance Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radiator Specialty Company, a Corporation v. First State Insurance Company, a Corporation, 836 F.2d 193, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15356, 1987 WL 32718 (1st Cir. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Radiator Specialty Company appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of First State Insurance Company. We affirm.

Radiator Specialty purchased excess products liability coverage from First State under two umbrella policies. The first policy covered the period from May 1, 1979 to May 1, 1980 and the second from May 1, 1980 until it was cancelled by Radiator Specialty on November 13, 1980. As required by the policies, Radiator Specialty maintained $500,000.00 underlying coverage with Ambassador Insurance Company. *194 Ambassador was subsequently declared insolvent.

During the period the umbrella coverage was in effect, seven products liability claims arose against Radiator Specialty. Radiator Specialty paid a total of $286,-784.06 on five of these claims due to the insolvency of Ambassador. One of the claims is still pending and another was settled pending this appeal.

Radiator Specialty instituted this suit seeking a declaration that the excess policies required First State to assume the role of primary carrier due to the insolvency of Ambassador. It asserted that provisions in the policies created an ambiguity as to who would be responsible for paying claims in the event the primary carrier became insolvent. Since the policies did not address the consequences of the insolvency of the primary carrier, it urged the conclusion that the responsibility should fall to the excess carrier. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court entered judgment for First State.

The district court’s well-reasoned opinion thoroughly addressed these issues. Our review of the record convinces us that the policies are unambiguous and that summary judgment was properly granted. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. London & Edinburgh Insurance Co., 354 F.2d 214, 217 (4th Cir.1965). We therefore affirm on the opinion of the district court. Radiator Specialty Co. v. First State Insurance Co., 651 F.Supp. 439 (W.D.N.C.1987).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopeman Bros., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co.
307 F. Supp. 3d 433 (E.D. Virginia, 2018)
Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados v. Librotex, Inc.
142 P.R. Dec. 820 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1997)
North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Century Indemnity Co.
444 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
630 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)
Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Columbia Casualty Insurance
11 Cal. App. 4th 1176 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Teague
972 F.2d 339 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)
Span, Inc. v. Associated International Insurance
227 Cal. App. 3d 463 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)
Kelly v. Weil
563 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
Shapiro v. Associated International Insurance
899 F.2d 1116 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Ware v. Carrom Health Care Products, Inc.
727 F. Supp. 300 (N.D. Mississippi, 1989)
Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Magic City Trucking Service, Inc.
547 So. 2d 849 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Highlands Insurance v. Gerber Products Co.
702 F. Supp. 109 (D. Maryland, 1988)
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co.
430 N.W.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
836 F.2d 193, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15356, 1987 WL 32718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radiator-specialty-company-a-corporation-v-first-state-insurance-company-ca1-1987.