Quinn v. Housing Auth. of Orlando

385 So. 2d 1167, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17008
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 27, 1980
Docket79-1083/T4-558 to 79-1091/T4-558H
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 385 So. 2d 1167 (Quinn v. Housing Auth. of Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinn v. Housing Auth. of Orlando, 385 So. 2d 1167, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

385 So.2d 1167 (1980)

Loretta QUINN et al., Appellants,
v.
The HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF ORLANDO, Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 79-1083/T4-558 to 79-1091/T4-558H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 27, 1980.

James C. Hauser, Orlando, for appellants.

H. Richard Bates of Anderson & Rush, Orlando, for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

This is the consolidated appeal of nine tenants living in rental housing leased from the Housing Authority. The Housing Authority filed complaints against the tenants seeking to evict them for non-payment of rent. The complaints were signed by the director of the Housing Authority. The tenants answered, raised affirmative defenses, and filed counterclaims. One of the affirmative defenses alleged that the complaints were filed by a corporation and signed by a non-lawyer. In its answers to requests for admissions, the Housing Authority admitted: (1) it is a corporation, and (2) its pleadings for eviction were signed by a non-attorney.

The Housing Authority moved for partial summary judgments on its eviction actions. In turn, the tenants moved for partial summary judgments or alternatively for dismissals on the ground that the complaints were filed by a corporation and signed by a non-attorney. The trial court granted the Housing Authority's motions and denied the tenants' motions. The tenants appealed.

A corporation is not a person and, therefore, a corporation cannot designate a non-attorney employee to represent it. Instead, a corporation must be represented by an attorney. Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association, 184 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Angelini v. Mobil Home Village, Inc., 310 So.2d 776 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Southeastern Associates, Inc. v. First Georgia Bank, 362 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, the partial summary judgment entered in favor of the Housing Authority was void and is hereby quashed and the trial court is directed to grant the tenants' motions for dismissal without prejudice. Due to our disposition of this issue, we do not need to decide the merits of appellants' other contentions.

QUASHED and REMANDED with directions.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunfine Florida, Inc. v. Golden Gate Development Corp.
796 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Torrey v. Leesburg Regional Medical Center
769 So. 2d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Torrey v. Leesburg Regional Medical Center
731 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Moreno Const. v. Clancy & Theys Const.
722 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Crocker v. Diland Corp.
593 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cook v. Arrowhead Mobile Home Community
50 Fla. Supp. 2d 26 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
Rubarr, Ltd. v. Hunter
49 Fla. Supp. 2d 88 (Broward County Court, 1991)
No.
Colorado Attorney General Reports, 1988
Objective Marketing Action, Ltd. v. Hills
516 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Golden Cleaver Packing, Inc. v. G & M HUGHES CORPORATION
490 So. 2d 1381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y Valores
476 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Punta Gorda Pines Development, Inc. v. Slack Excavating, Inc.
468 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
R.J.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Florida Meat & Seafood, Inc.
9 Fla. Supp. 2d 138 (Florida County Courts, 1985)
Magnolias Nursing and Convalescent Center v. DEPT. OF HLT. & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
428 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass Inc.
417 So. 2d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Floyd v. Housing Authority of Orlando
389 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 So. 2d 1167, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-housing-auth-of-orlando-fladistctapp-1980.