No.

CourtColorado Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 25, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of No. (No.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
No., (Colo. 1988).

Opinion

David Thomas Executive Director Department of Public Safety 700 Kipling Lakewood, Colorado 80215

John N. Dempsey, Chief Colorado State Patrol 700 Kipling Lakewood, Colorado 80215

Dear Messrs. Thomas and Dempsey:

This opinion letter is in response to your December 9, 1987 letter, in which you inquired whether a Colorado State Patrol officer has the authority to make an arrest for a nontraffic crime when probable cause for such arrest develops during the course of a traffic stop.

QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION

Your request for an Attorney General's opinion presents the following question:

May a Colorado State Patrol officer make an arrest for, and file a criminal case on, a nontraffic offense which was discovered during the course of a traffic stop?

A Colorado State Patrol officer may lawfully arrest for a nontraffic crime discovered in the course of performing his statutory duties and in particular, in the course of and incident to, a lawful traffic stop; it is solely within the discretion of the appropriate district attorney, however, to make the determination of whether criminal charges will be filed following an arrest.

ANALYSIS

Two separate statutes in the Colorado legislative scheme address the authority and powers of the Colorado State Patrol (hereafter, "the Patrol"): (1) the Patrol's enabling act, which states the agency's affirmative powers and duties, sections 24-33.5-201 to24-33.5-226, C.R.S. (1987) (hereafter, "the Act") and (2) the peace officer statute, section 18-1-901(3), C.R.S. (1986).

The primary duty of the Patrol is to "promote safety, protect human life, and preserve the highways of this state. . . ." Section 24-33.5-212(2), C.R.S. (1987). Consequently, the Act provides the Colorado State Patrol with varying specific powers and responsibilities that range from enforcement of the motor vehicle laws to enforcement of the automobile theft laws, vehicle inspection, investigation of traffic accidents and closures of highways for athletic or other special events.1 The Act further provides that Patrol officers "shall not be used . . . by any authority of the state in any manner in the enforcement of any law other than that specifically provided in [the Act] or as may be otherwise specifically provided inany other law of this state" (emphasis supplied).

The peace officer statute provides, in pertinent part:

"Peace officer, level I," means a police officer, undersheriff, deputy sheriff, Colorado state patrol officer pursuant to section 24-33.5-212, C.R.S., marshal, or security officer employed by any state institution of higher education pursuant to the limitations set forth in section 24-7-103, C.R.S., who is employed by the state or any city, city and county, town, or county within this state and who is certified pursuant to section 24-33.5-306, C.R.S. "Peace officer, level I," has the authority to enforce all the laws of the state of Colorado while acting within the scope of his authority and in the performance of his duties.

Section 18-1-901(3)(l)(I), C.R.S. (1987) (emphasis supplied).

Any power and authority of a Patrol officer to enforce nontraffic crimes obviously would derive from the second sentence of the peace officer provision. It is reasonable to assume the plain meaning of the phrase "all the laws of the State of Colorado" includes the nontraffic provisions of the Colorado Criminal Code. And, any argument that that provision would not apply to all of the officers defined as "peace officer level I," including members of the Patrol, would result in a strained interpretation in violation of principles of statutory construction.See Harding v. Industrial Commission,183 Colo. 52, 515 P.2d 95 (1973).

Obviously, the power of a peace officer "to enforce" the laws encompasses search and seizure (including arrest) powers.See People v. Shockley, 41 Colo. App. 515,591 P.2d 589, 591 (1979) (statutory phrase "enforcement of the penal law" includes those activities which a peace officer is under a duty to perform in order to give effect to a penal law).

The level I peace officer authority to enforce all laws of the state is limited, however, by the phrase "while acting within the scope of his authority and in the performance of his duties." Section 18-1-901(3)(l)(I), C.R.S. (1986). As noted above, the "duties" of the Colorado State Patrol are set forth in the Act, sections 24-33.5-201 to 24-33.5-226, C.R.S. (1987). The phrase "scope of authority" has been analyzed in terms of the territorial jurisdiction of peace officers to effect a lawful arrest; absent fresh pursuit or exigent circumstances, peace officers are authorized to arrest, search and seize evidence only within the boundaries of the employing jurisdiction. Peoplev. Hamilton, 666 P.2d 152 (Colo. 1983).

While it is clear that a major portion of the Patrol's duties involve travel upon and enforcement of laws relating to highways, several powers and duties of troopers relate to investigation and enforcement of state laws which do not carry definable physical boundaries (i.e., the automobile theft law or the special events law). In light of the Patrol's varied powers and duties, a practical physical delineation of the Patrol's territorial jurisdiction would be those geographic areas in which the Patrol operates to fulfill its statutory duties. Thus, when a Colorado State Patrol officer is "acting within the scope of his authority and in the performance of his duties," he must be acting pursuant to powers granted by enabling legislation and he must be physically operating in those areas where such duties require him to be present.

The legislature provides authority to Patrol officers in both title 24 and title 18. Reading the statutes together, giving effect to both, leads me to conclude that Patrol officers have authority to enforce all criminal laws, including the authority to seize evidence of, and arrest for, nontraffic offenses, where the probable cause for the nontraffic arrest arose during the course of carrying out the Patrol's statutory duties. State and federal cases lend support to this result. SeePeople v. Tottenhoff, 691 P.2d 340 (Colo. 1984);United States v. Gay, 774 F.2d 368 (10th Cir. 1985).

The Patrol's authority to "enforce all laws" can not be construed to include the authority to file criminal cases. Section 16-5-205, C.R.S. (1986), which governs the filing of criminal informations, indictments, warrants and summons, places the charging authority in the Office of the District Attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thomas Norman Gay
774 F.2d 368 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
People v. Hamilton
666 P.2d 152 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1983)
People v. Shockley
591 P.2d 589 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Lucero
623 P.2d 424 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Lewis
680 P.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1984)
People v. Tottenhoff
691 P.2d 340 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1984)
Harding v. Industrial Commission
515 P.2d 95 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
No., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/no-coloag-1988.