Objective Marketing Action, Ltd. v. Hills
516 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11069, 1987 WL 1583
Opinion
The trial court correctly ruled that the corporation, unlike a natural person, could not represent itself in court or appear without an attorney. See Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So.2d 247 (Fla.3d DCA 1985); Quinn v. Hous. Auth. of Orlando, 385 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Objective Marketing Action, Ltd. v. Hills, 516 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11069, 1987 WL 1583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
516 So. 2d 28 (Objective Marketing Action, Ltd. v. Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y Valores
476 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Quinn v. Housing Auth. of Orlando
385 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)