Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.
279 A.D. 805, 109 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1952·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
There was no sufficient showing warranting the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (Cf. O’Callaghan v. Browley, 276 App. Div. 908; Braver v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879; Pitrello v. Garro, 278 App. Div. 770; Svei v. Minck Bros, & Co., 279 App. Div. 597.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co., 279 A.D. 805, 109 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 805 (Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Engongoro v. Di Palma
17 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Mullally v. Cornish
1 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Sheehan v. Behr
1 A.D.2d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Farewell v. Milbank
284 A.D. 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)