Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

279 A.D. 805, 109 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 805 (Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co., 279 A.D. 805, 109 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

There was no sufficient showing warranting the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (Cf. O’Callaghan v. Browley, 276 App. Div. 908; Braver v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879; Pitrello v. Garro, 278 App. Div. 770; Svei v. Minck Bros, & Co., 279 App. Div. 597.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Engongoro v. Di Palma
17 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Mullally v. Cornish
1 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Sheehan v. Behr
1 A.D.2d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Farewell v. Milbank
284 A.D. 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 805, 109 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-f-m-schaefer-brewing-co-nyappdiv-1952.