Pitrello v. Garro
This text of 278 A.D. 770 (Pitrello v. Garro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference in the trial of the action reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied, without costs. In our opinion, upon the facts disclosed by the record, the granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Cf. O’Callaghan V. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D. 770, 103 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitrello-v-garro-nyappdiv-1951.