Sheehan v. Behr

1 A.D.2d 1037, 152 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5317
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, Edward Behr, one of the defendants in Action No. 1, appeals from order which, on reargument, granted a motion for a preference, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph everything following the word respects ” and by substituting therefor the word denied ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Destitution and incapacity to work are insufficiently shown. (Farewell v. Milbank, 284 App. Div. 898; Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co., 279 App. Div. 597; Quinlan v. Schaefer Brewing Co., 279 App. Div. 805; O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheehan v. Behr, 1 A.D.2d 1037, 152 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

1 A.D.2d 1037 (Sheehan v. Behr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Horn Construction Co.
12 A.D.2d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)