Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co.

279 A.D. 597, 107 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In our opinion there is no such showing of plaintiffs’ indigence in the moving papers as warrants the preference in trial of'this action over the many causes awaiting trial in regular order; and in granting the motion the court improvidently exercised the discretion vested in it. (O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Greene v. McDermott, 245 App. Div. 726; Lavicka v. National Transp. Co., 264 App. Div. 785; Thomas v. Green Bus Lines, 276 App. Div. 922; Braver v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co., 279 A.D. 597, 107 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

279 A.D. 597 (Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheehan v. Behr
1 A.D.2d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Farewell v. Milbank
284 A.D. 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Brown v. Upfold
204 Misc. 416 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.
279 A.D. 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)