Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r

Tenth Circuit

Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 2007

Docket06-1187

StatusUnpublished

This text of Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r (Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r, (10th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS March 16, 2007 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

PU BLIC SER VIC E C OM PA N Y OF C OLO RA D O ,

Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Appellee,

v. No. 06-1187 (D.C. No. 1:04-CV -1828-RB -CB S) BO AR D O F COU NTY (D . Colo.) C OM M ISSIO N ER S O F SA N M IGUEL COUNTY, State of Colorado; ELAINE FISH ER, San M iguel County Commissioner in her official capacity; ART GOODTIM ES, San M iguel County Commissioner in his official capacity; V ER NO N EBERT, San M iguel County Commissioner in his official capacity; THE SAN M IGU EL COUN TY PLANNING DEPA RTM ENT, State of Colorado; M ICHAEL ROZYCKI, San M iguel County Planning Director, in his official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

PATHFIND ER DEVELO PM ENT, IN C.,

Defendant - Counter-Claimant - Appellee,

W ILLARD F. JAN KE,

Intervenor - A ppellant. OR DER AND JUDGM ENT *

Before BR ISC OE, HOL LOW AY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

W illard F. Janke appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

intervene in Pub. Serv. Co. of Colo. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, No. 04-RB-1828

(D. Colo. Sept. 2, 2004). Because we determined that case is moot, we remanded

with instructions to dismiss. Pub. Serv. Co. of C olo. v. Bd. of C ounty Comm’rs,

Nos. 05-1295 & 05-1321 (10th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, Janke’s appeal is

D ISM ISSE D as moot.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 (eff. Dec. 1, 2006) and 10th Cir. R. 32.1 (eff. Jan. 1, 2007).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS March 16, 2007 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

PU BLIC SER VIC E C OM PA N Y OF C OLO RA D O ,

Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Appellee,

v. No. 06-1187 (D.C. No. 1:04-CV -1828-RB -CB S) BO AR D O F COU NTY (D . Colo.) C OM M ISSIO N ER S O F SA N M IGUEL COUNTY, State of Colorado; ELAINE FISH ER, San M iguel County Commissioner in her official capacity; ART GOODTIM ES, San M iguel County Commissioner in his official capacity; V ER NO N EBERT, San M iguel County Commissioner in his official capacity; THE SAN M IGU EL COUN TY PLANNING DEPA RTM ENT, State of Colorado; M ICHAEL ROZYCKI, San M iguel County Planning Director, in his official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

PATHFIND ER DEVELO PM ENT, IN C.,

Defendant - Counter-Claimant - Appellee,

W ILLARD F. JAN KE,

Intervenor - A ppellant. OR DER AND JUDGM ENT *

Before BR ISC OE, HOL LOW AY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

W illard F. Janke appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

intervene in Pub. Serv. Co. of Colo. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, No. 04-RB-1828

(D. Colo. Sept. 2, 2004). Because we determined that case is moot, we remanded

with instructions to dismiss. Pub. Serv. Co. of C olo. v. Bd. of C ounty Comm’rs,

Nos. 05-1295 & 05-1321 (10th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, Janke’s appeal is

D ISM ISSE D as moot.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 (eff. Dec. 1, 2006) and 10th Cir. R. 32.1 (eff. Jan. 1, 2007).

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Public Service Co. v. Bd. County Comm'r, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-co-v-bd-county-commr-ca10-2007.