FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—REGULATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER POWER AND RESOURCES

Exercise by licensee of power of eminent domain

16 U.S.C. § 814
Title16Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—REGULATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER POWER AND RESOURCES

This text of 16 U.S.C. § 814 (Exercise by licensee of power of eminent domain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 814.

Text

When any licensee cannot acquire by contract or pledges an unimproved dam site or the right to use or damage the lands or property of others necessary to the construction, maintenance, or operation of any dam, reservoir, diversion structure, or the works appurtenant or accessory thereto, in conjunction with any improvement which in the judgment of the commission is desirable and justified in the public interest for the purpose of improving or developing a waterway or waterways for the use or benefit of interstate or foreign commerce, it may acquire the same by the exercise of the right of eminent domain in the district court of the United States for the district in which such land or other property may be located, or in the State courts. The practice and procedure in any action or proceedi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
414 U.S. 661 (Supreme Court, 1974)
907 case citations
City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
357 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1958)
318 case citations
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
362 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1960)
276 case citations
Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians
466 U.S. 765 (Supreme Court, 1984)
156 case citations
Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.
523 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
89 case citations
Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of Land
563 F.2d 1178 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
43 case citations
Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Land, Cullman County
197 F.3d 1368 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
41 case citations
Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co.
518 F.3d 459 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
39 case citations
United States v. 33.5 Acres of Land
789 F.2d 1396 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
36 case citations
Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro
335 U.S. 359 (Supreme Court, 1949)
31 case citations
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. Real Estate
255 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (N.D. Florida, 2017)
22 case citations
Georgia Power Co. v. 138.30 Acres of Land
596 F.2d 644 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
20 case citations
Nez Perce Tribe v. Idaho Power Co.
847 F. Supp. 791 (D. Idaho, 1994)
16 case citations
Rivers Electric Co. v. 4.6 Acres of Land Located in Town of Catskill
731 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. New York, 1990)
8 case citations
Beezer v. City of Seattle
373 P.2d 796 (Washington Supreme Court, 1962)
8 case citations
Jordan v. Randolph Mills, Inc.
29 B.R. 398 (M.D. North Carolina, 1983)
6 case citations
Chapman v. Public Utility District No. 1
367 F.2d 163 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
6 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, §21, 41 Stat. 1074; renumbered pt. I, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §212, 49 Stat. 847; Pub. L. 102–486, title XVII, §1701(d), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3009.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1992—Pub. L. 102–486 substituted final proviso and sentence for period at end.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/814.